54C Mildmay Park London N1 4PR
Struck outNew rulesDecided 8 September 2026Case LON/00AU/MRA/2026/0017
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in N1 from £365.92 a week to £500 a week. The tribunal struck out the tenant's application because the notice was served on the superseded Form 4 and did not give the required two months' notice, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction. The decision states that the proposed new rent is therefore not payable by the tenant.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Asked for
- “…eriod beginning not earlier than— (a)[two months] after the date of the service of the notice……. Facts Found 4. On 1 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £500.00 per week in place of the existing rent of £365.92 to take effect from 1 June 2026. 5. The notice was served in the superseded Form 4 notice which contains out of date guidance notes for Ten…”
Other decisions in N1
All of N1- Flat 16, Newstead House, 57A Liverpool Road, Islington, London, N1 0RTFull increase, 2-bed flat, 10 Aug 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £1,000, asked £1,326£1,326Was £1,000, asked £1,326
- Flat 36, Priory Heights, 2A Wynford Road, London, N1 9SLPart of it, 2-bed flat, 13 Jul 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £2,000, asked £2,096£2,050Was £2,000, asked £2,096
- Flat 6A, 90 Britannia Walk, London N1 7NQFull increase, 2-bed flat, 8 Sept 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £868, asked £896£896Was £868, asked £896
- 112 Offord Road, London, N1 1PFPart of it, 2-bed flat, 1 Jul 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £1,500, asked £2,619£1,610Was £1,500, asked £2,619