37 Burton Road, Carlton, Nottingham, NG4 3DQ
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 22 July 2026Case BIR/37UE/MNR/2026/0096
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent of a property in NG4 from £685 per calendar month to £720 per calendar month. The tribunal struck out the application because it found the notice invalid, as the new rent start date fell within 52 weeks of the date the current rent took effect. The landlord had argued that the increase had only been postponed as a goodwill gesture, but the tribunal was not satisfied the notice was valid for its jurisdiction to be engaged.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…____________________________________ REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 5th March 2026 the Landlord served a Notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £720 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £685 pcm to take effect from 30th April 2026. 2. On 16th April 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the…”
- Asked for
- “…_____ DECISION - THE APPLICATION IS STRUCK OUT ____________________________________ REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 5th March 2026 the Landlord served a Notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £720 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £685 pcm to take effect from 30th April 2026. 2. On 16th April 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the…”
Other decisions in NG4
All of NG4- 66 Calverton Avenue Carlton Nottingham NG4 1NDPart of it, 3-bed house, 18 Jun 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £450, asked £850£800Was £450, asked £850