208a High Street, Bromley, Kent BR1 1PW
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 1 June 2026Case LON/00AF/MNR/2026/0207
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in BR1 from £1200 a month to £1850 a month. The tribunal found it had no jurisdiction to determine a market rent, because the tenancy agreement contains a rent review clause (clause 5.17) from which the parties could ascertain the rent payable. No rent was determined.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…t takes effect Not applicable. REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. 3. On 30 March 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1850 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £1200 per calendar month to take effect from 31 May 2026. On 16 April 2026 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent t…”
- Asked for
- “…ent Determined No jurisdiction. Date the new rent takes effect Not applicable. REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. 3. On 30 March 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1850 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £1200 per calendar month to take effect from 31 May 2026. On 16 April 2026 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant refer…”
Other decisions in BR1
All of BR1- 23 Swiftsden Way Bromley BR1 4NSPart of it, 1-bed flat, 27 Aug 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £1,400, asked £1,517£1,430Was £1,400, asked £1,517
- 23 Swiftsden Way, Bromley, BR1 4N1-bed flat, 7 Aug 2025, pre-Act rules£1,254