Studio 2, 94 High Street, Brierley Hill, West Midlands, DY5 3AP
Struck outNew rulesDecided 11 August 2026Case BIR/00CR/MRA/2026/0026
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in the DY5 postcode district from £373 a month to £430 a month. The tribunal struck out the application because the rent increase notice was invalid: the new rent was to start on 13 July 2026, which was not the beginning of a tenancy period. No rent was determined.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…this application REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 12 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £430.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £373.00 pcm to take effect from 13 July 2026. 2. On 5 July 2026, under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the Tribu…”
- Asked for
- “…ction in relation to these proceedings and strikes out this application REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 12 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £430.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £373.00 pcm to take effect from 13 July 2026. 2. On 5 July 2026, under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred…”
Other decisions in DY5
All of DY5- 1 Madison Avenue, Brierly Hill, Dudley, West Midlands, DY5 1TZFull increase, 2-bed house, 20 Aug 2026, new rulesWas £1,120, asked £1,250£1,250Was £1,120, asked £1,250
- 14B Dunns Bank Brierley Hill Dudley West Midlands DY5 2ET4-bed house, 1 Oct 2024, pre-Act rules£1,250