Flat 2 Pear Tree Court, Bridge Street, Rothwell, Kettering, Northamptonshire, NN14 6FF
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 5 July 2026Case CAM/34UE/MNR/2026/0037
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord, Inclusion Housing, served a notice proposing to raise the rent of a flat in NN14 from £457.61 a week to £518.11 a week. The tribunal declined to determine a rent because the tenancy agreement contains clauses allowing the landlord to increase the rent, which the Section 13 procedure did not cover when the notice was served on 9 February 2026. It said it would proceed only if the County Court advised otherwise.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…Date the new rent takes effect N/A REASONS FOR THE DECISION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. On 9 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £518.11 per week in place of the existing rent of £457.61 per week to take effect from 6 April 2026. On 18 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the…”
- Asked for
- “…ecision 5 July 2026 Rent Determined N/A Date the new rent takes effect N/A REASONS FOR THE DECISION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. On 9 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £518.11 per week in place of the existing rent of £457.61 per week to take effect from 6 April 2026. On 18 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlo…”