Flat 19 Wharf Mill Apartments, Laburnum Street, London, E2 8FT
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The tenant referred a landlord's notice of rent increase for a flat in E2 to the tribunal, when the rent was stated to be £2050 pcm. The tribunal found the notice invalid because it did not give the two calendar months' notice now required under the Renters' Rights Act 2025 and because it did not use the rent period date set out in the tenancy. With no valid notice, the tribunal had nothing to determine and the rent remains £2050 pcm.
Neither side gave the tribunal comparable lettings.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…tenant: 2. It does not adopt the correct rent period as set out in the lease. 3 9 There being no valid notice of rent increase for either of the 2 reasons above, there is nothing for the Tribunal to determine. The rent remains unchanged at its passing level, stated by the tenant to be £2050 pcm. Name: N. Martindale FRICS Date: Rights of appeal 28 August 2026 By rule 36(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chambe…”
Other decisions in E2
All of E2- Flat 42 Maitland House, Bishops Way, London E2 9HTFull increase, 2-bed flat, 19 Mar 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £1,550, asked £1,900£1,900Was £1,550, asked £1,900
- Flat 16 South Mill Apartments, Hebden Street, E2 8FZPart of it, 2-bed flat, 28 Oct 2024, pre-Act rulesWas £2,700, asked £3,036£2,800Was £2,700, asked £3,036