66 Merryhills Drive, Oakwood, London EN2 7NZ
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 1 June 2026Case LON/00AK/MNR/2026/0135
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in the EN2 postcode district from £4,000 a month to £4,200 a month. The tribunal decided it did not have jurisdiction to determine the rent, so the application did not proceed. It said the tenancy agreement contains a rent review clause (Custom Clause 9) that the parties could use to set the rent, and that the proposed increase was not above the average London rent increase under that clause.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…n to determine the rent. REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. 3. On 6 February 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £4,200.00 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £4,000 per calendar month to take effect from 12 March 2026. On 2 March 2026 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent…”
- Asked for
- “…2026 Decision The tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine the rent. REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. 3. On 6 February 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £4,200.00 per calendar month in place of the existing rent of £4,000 per calendar month to take effect from 12 March 2026. On 2 March 2026 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant…”
Other decisions in EN2
All of EN2- £1,100Was £850