4 Keevil Drive, London, SW19 6TA
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 10 June 2026Case LON/00BJ/MNR/2026/0173
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in SW19 from £1,450 a month to £1,850 a month from 1 April 2026. The tribunal made no rent determination: it was not satisfied it should proceed, because the notice dated 12 March 2026 appeared not to give the minimum notice period required by section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988. The existing rent of £1,450 a month therefore remains payable unless it is changed by agreement or a valid notice.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…ate of Decision 10 June 2026 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 12 March 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,850 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,450 pcm to take effect from 01 April 2026. 2. On 30 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the Tr…”
- Asked for
- “…1988 Tribunal Members Judge Wendy Banks Dr Jan Wilcox Date of Decision 10 June 2026 REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 12 March 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,850 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,450 pcm to take effect from 01 April 2026. 2. On 30 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referr…”