36 Bishops Rise, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9HH
Struck outNew rulesDecided 5 August 2026Case CAM/26UL/MRA/2026/0003
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent for a property in AL10 from £1,550 a month to £1,700 a month. The tribunal struck out the application because the landlord's notice gave only one month's notice of the new rent, whereas section 13(2)(a) of the Housing Act 1988 requires at least two months, so there was no valid notice to determine. The rent payable therefore remains unchanged at £1,550 a month.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…es effect N/A REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 01 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,700.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,550.00 pcm to take effect from 01 June 2026. 2. On 27 May 2026, under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the Tri…”
- Asked for
- “…nth Date of Valuation 05 August 2026 Date the new rent takes effect N/A REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 01 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,700.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1,550.00 pcm to take effect from 01 June 2026. 2. On 27 May 2026, under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant refe…”
Other decisions in AL10
All of AL10- 31 Salisbury Hall Drive, Hatfield, AL10 9GJAbove the ask, Flat, 14 Nov 2024, pre-Act rulesAsked £663£997Asked £663