Rent Increase Checker

3 Montgomery Close, Colchester, Essex, CO2 8SJ

Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 17 March 2025Case CAM/22UG/MNR/2024/0636

No rent was set

The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.

In short

The landlord proposed raising the rent of a property in CO2 from £650 a month to £900 a month. The tribunal struck out the application because it found the tenancy agreement contains a rent review provision, which took the tenancy outside section 13(1) of the Housing Act 1988 and meant it had no jurisdiction to determine a rent. As a result the tribunal did not consider the tenant's evidence about damp, mould and other condition issues.

Neither side gave the tribunal comparable lettings.

Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How

Read the decision on GOV.UKDownload the PDF
Where the figures came from
Rent before
“…nt (the Notice) by the Landlord of the Property under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. 2. Enclosed with this application was a letter dated 1st October 2024 from the Landlord, stating that the rent would be increased from £650.00 per month to £900 per month with effect from 31 October 2024. A copy of the tenancy agreement was also enclosed. 3. The Tribunal acknowledged receipt of the Application and wrote to both parties on 13 Decemb…”

Other decisions in CO2

All of CO2
  1. 42 Avignon Close, Mountbatten Estate, Colchester, Essex, CO2 8YH
    Part of it, Studio, 24 Dec 2025, pre-Act rules
    Was £560, asked £695
    £650