27 Hadley Road, Mitcham, CR4 1NW
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 29 May 2026Case LON/00BA/MNR/2026/0265
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent from £1,575 a month to £2,200 a month. The tribunal struck out the application because it has no jurisdiction to decide whether the notice is valid; the proposed start date of 4 May 2026 appears defective, and that question is for the County Court. No rent was determined.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…ed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy. On a signed notice dated 12 May 2025, the Landlord served a Notice of Increase in the prescribed form. The notice purported to increase the rent from £1,575 to £2,200 per month. Paragraph 4 of the Notice specified: "The starting date for the new rent will be 4 May 2026. By an application dated 23 April 2026, the Applicant tenant referred the Not…”
- Asked for
- “…under assured periodic tenancies. By section 13(2), the landlord must serve on the tenant a notice in the prescribed form proposing a new rent to take effect at the beginning of a new period of the tenancy. On a signed notice dated 12 May 2025, the Landlord served a Notice of Increase in the prescribed form. The notice purported to increase the rent from £1,575 to £2,200 per month. Paragraph 4 of the Notice specified: "The starting dat…”
Other decisions in CR4
All of CR4- 42 Mitcham Park Mitcham Surrey CR4 4EJFull increase, 4-bed house, 9 Jul 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £2,600, asked £2,800£2,800Was £2,600, asked £2,800
- 15 Buckingham Court, Lancaster Avenue, Mitcham CR4 1QNAbove the ask, 2-bed flat, 15 Oct 2024, pre-Act rulesWas £1,005, asked £1,082£1,560Was £1,005, asked £1,082