20 Birkhall Close, Chatham ME5 7QD
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 4 July 2026Case HAV/00LC/MNR/2026/0082
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord, KCJZ Properties Limited, purported to serve two notices proposing a new rent of £230 and £245 a week in place of the existing £202 a week. The tribunal found neither notice valid because they were not signed or dated, the first start date was not the start of a tenancy period, and no service dates were given, and the landlord did not respond to the tribunal's direction. It therefore made no determination of the market rent.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Asked for
- “…ed n/a Date the new rent takes effect n/a REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On unknown dates, the Landlord purported to serve two notices under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which respectively proposed a new rent of £230 and £245 per week (pw) in place of the existing rent of £202 pw to take effect respectively from 1st January 2026 and 23rd March 2026. 2. On 16th April 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Hous…”
Other decisions in ME5
All of ME5- 106 Kingfisher Drive, Chatham, Kent, ME5 7NZPart of it, 3-bed house, 14 May 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £1,060, asked £1,260£1,220Was £1,060, asked £1,260