18 Intelligence Walk, Ashford, Kent, TN23 3FE
Struck outPre-Act rulesDecided 2 June 2026Case HAV/00HR/MNR/2026/0096
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed a rent of £1375.00 per calendar month in place of the existing £1455.00 per calendar month for a property in TN23, under a notice served under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The tribunal did not determine a rent and struck out the application because the tenancy agreement contains a contractual rent review clause, which takes it outside section 13 as it applied before 1 May 2026.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…s effect - © CROWN COPYRIGHT REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 19 March 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1375.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1455.00 pcm to take effect from 1 May 2026. 2. On 31 March 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the Tri…”
- Asked for
- “…ion 2 June 2026 Rent Determined - Date the new rent takes effect - © CROWN COPYRIGHT REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. On 19 March 2026 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1375.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1455.00 pcm to take effect from 1 May 2026. 2. On 31 March 2024, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referr…”
Other decisions in TN23
All of TN23- 101 Laurens Van Der Post Way, Ashford, Kent, TN23 3GWFull increase, 4-bed house, 22 Oct 2024, pre-Act rulesWas £1,550, asked £1,750£1,750Was £1,550, asked £1,750