136 Old Bedford Road, Luton, LU2 7HH
Struck outNew rulesDecided 30 September 2026Case CAM/00KA/MRA/2026/0052
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord proposed raising the rent of a house in LU2 from £1000 a month to £2200 a month. The tribunal struck out the application because the notice was not validly served: it found the tenancy was held jointly by two tenants but the notice named only one, which did not meet section 13(2) and Form 4A of the Housing Act 1988. With no valid notice, the tribunal had no jurisdiction and made no rent determination.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Rent before
- “…t applicable REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. On 31 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2200.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1000.00 pcm to take effect from 1 August 2026. On 29 July 2026 under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord's notice proposing a new rent to the Tribun…”
- Asked for
- “…luation Not applicable Date the new rent takes effect Not applicable REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background 1. 2. On 31 May 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13 (2) (as amended) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2200.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1000.00 pcm to take effect from 1 August 2026. On 29 July 2026 under Section 14 (A3) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred…”
Other decisions in LU2
All of LU2- Flat 11, Brooklands Court, Stirling Drive, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 0GEPart of it, 2-bed flat, 9 Jul 2026, pre-Act rulesWas £1,310, asked £1,450£1,410Was £1,310, asked £1,450