106 West Street Kings Cliffe Peterborough PE8 6XA
No rent was set
The application was struck out, so the tribunal did not set a rent. This most often happens when the landlord's notice was invalid or the tribunal had no jurisdiction.
In short
The landlord applied for a review of, and permission to appeal, the tribunal's decision of 28 February 2025, which had set aside the landlord's notice of increase. The tribunal refused both, saying it does not have jurisdiction to set a new rent under section 14 where the tenancy appears to be protected by the Rent Act 1977 with a registered rent of £470 a month, as the landlord described it. The tribunal said the landlord should seek a new fair rent from the Rent Officer, and that the tenancy status and any balances must be determined by the County Court.
Summary written by an AI model from the published decision and checked automatically for names and figures. How
Where the figures came from
- Asked for
- “…al is likely to be successful.” 6. The landlord seeks a review and permission to appeal the Decision. The landlord states at 1.2: “The First-tier Tribunal's decision set aside the validly served Section 13 rent increase notice and reverted the rent to £470 per calendar month the previously registered rent under the Rent Act 1977.” And at 1.3: “The Appellant submits that this decision is legally flawed and should be set aside or varied.”…”
Other decisions in PE8
All of PE8- 1 Front Row Cottages, Stoke Doyle, Oundle, PE8 5TJFull increase, 3-bed house, 29 Aug 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £520, asked £650£650Was £520, asked £650
- 106 West Street Kings Cliffe Peterborough Cambs PE8 6XH2-bed house, 6 Jan 2025, pre-Act rulesWas £595, asked £675—Was £595, asked £675